Search for: "State v. Sharp"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 7:08 pm
They pointed out that this was dealt with in the recent case of R. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:08 pm
They pointed out that this was dealt with in the recent case of R. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 2:32 am
In 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided, New Jersey v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:33 am
The gravest threat today to public-employee unions—which represent cops, firefighters, prison guards, teachers, nurses, and other city and state workers—is a Supreme Court case named Harris v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
The lawsuit, National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
Today's LA Times has An unexpected check on Supreme Court’s sharp move right: Justice KavanaughLaw360 has 5 Supreme Court Cases to Watch This Fall, 'Administrative State' Attacks Soar To High Court Crescendo and First-Time Advocates Dominate High Court's Fall Schedule, the last of which begins:Solo practitioner Howard Bashman had almost given up all hope on his goal of arguing before the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
One of the arguments in the amicus brief I filed on Perich’s behalf concerned the Court’s leading free exercise precedent, Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 8:06 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:39 am
On 29 June 2022, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd and Anor [2022] UKSC 19. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:18 pm
Op. at 9 (quoting Craven v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Five years later, in Franklin v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 11:44 am
Facts: This case (Marland et al v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:58 am
The case was Harbison v. [read post]
