Search for: "State v. South"
Results 341 - 360
of 11,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:28 pm
See Wilson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:51 pm
In Milkovich v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
(See prior posting.)Also yesterday in Rosenbrahn v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:23 am
On this day in history, a mere twelve years after the Supreme Court sanctioned racial segregation in public facilities in Plessy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:28 pm
Watson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am
Finally, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines Artemio V. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:45 am
See Yancey v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
I then look forward to the South Carolina’s recent decision, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
(Wainohu v The State of New South Wales [2011] HCA 24; see... [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 12:44 am
The amicus brief of the University of South Florida (USF) in Bilski begins:The University of South Florida (hereinafter, "USF") is the nation's ninth largest public university and a leading research institution. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:23 am
The case of Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
Here is the opinion in South Point Energy Center LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:35 am
Here is the opinion in South Point Energy Center v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:58 am
For example, in South African Post Office Ltd v CCMA and others (2012) 33 ILJ 2970 (LC) the court noted that while there have been cases which held that an acting allowance does not constitute a “benefit”. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:18 am
The case of McNaughton v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:16 am
Williams v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:19 pm
South Carolina is the only state in which a spouse’s adultery will bar alimony–a punishment for “bad” spouses, typically “bad” wives. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Instead of resolving the conflict, the Court conspicuously evaded the issue.Part IV discusses the spread of residential segregation laws in the South and border states during the 1910s, and the support these laws found in contemporary law reviews.This Article next focuses on Buchanan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
The Supreme Court of South Carolina answered that question in Tadlock Painting Company v. [read post]
