Search for: "State v. South"
Results 341 - 360
of 12,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
It should be noted that South Carolina has not adopted the Daubert test and instead follows its own test set forth in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
Eve Gray (UCT) opened with a neo-colonial background into South Africa’s copyright reform noting the interplay of colonialism in the fair use v fair dealing debate. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Sinanian for coming up from down south to join us, and of course to Mitch Wood and Ana Castillo at the State Bar for all their hard work. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Code Section 20-3-130 states that in a South Carolina divorce, “the court may grant alimony or separate maintenance and support in such amounts and for such term as the court considers appropriate as from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case may be just, [temporarily], and permanently. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:47 pm
Last week in Baddou v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
SEC and the respondents in South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
South Dakota has an attorney general with backbone. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
In other news… United States Reuters reports that the United States is open to the possibility of joint FON patrols with the Philippines in the South China Sea. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
Phipps wrote that in Auld v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:28 pm
See Wilson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
See Rhines v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:51 pm
In Milkovich v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
Robert v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
(See prior posting.)Also yesterday in Rosenbrahn v. [read post]
