Search for: "State v. T. C." Results 341 - 360 of 17,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Case Summaries: N.C. Court of Appeals (Feb. 6, 2024)
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
State v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII? – January 2024
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Hak c. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
 C. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
 C. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
C-319/22 Gesamtverband Autoteile-Handel eV v. Scania: how to solve the “indirect personal data” riddle?
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Stephanie Rossello
On 26 April 2023 the General Court ruled in the case T-557/20 (SRB v. [read post]
European Law Blog - https://europeanlawblog.eu/
Guest Post: Year in Review: 2023 Key Management and Professional Liability Insurance Coverage Decisions
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Blog Post: California: WCAB Practices Are Evolving: Are Their Templates Evolving as Well?
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
C. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Taking Stock of ICJ Decisions in the ‘Ukraine v. Russia’ Cases—And implications for South Africa’s case against Israel
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am by Oona A. Hathaway
In South Africa v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
The Perils of Indeterminate LLC Membership Interests, Redux
4 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm by Peter Mahler
I won’t discuss Justice Masley’s rejection of defendants’ statute of limitations defense. [read post]
New York Business Divorce - http://www.nybusinessdivorce.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
WIPIP session 7: Design Law
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Mazer v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
WIPIP session 6: IP Theory
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Graham v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
WIPIP session 5: Anti-Circumvention
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”  If the presidency isn’t an office of the United States, of what sovereignty is it an office? [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
WIPIP session 3: Cultural Production
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State doesn’t just “incentivize”—it criminalizes and tries to generate particular social outputs. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
The Fundamentals of Easement Valuation
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
 See, e.g., Wayne C. [read post]
Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski Journal - https://ackerman-ackerman.com/journal/
Think You Understand Online Trespass to Chattels Law? Think Again–In re Meta Healthcare Pixels
1 Feb 2024, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
[Note: the court cites Facebook v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/