Search for: "State v. T. P. D." Results 341 - 360 of 3,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Lehnert, 131 P.3d 1104 (Colorado Court of Appeals 2005), rev'd, 163 P.3d 1111 (Colo.2007); People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:30 am by admin
  Then, in a true illustration of the state of mind of the guy who won’t pay the two dollars, the dealer and his lawyer removed the case from small claims to regular court. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Elle rappelle en outre que ceux qui créent, interprètent, diffusent ou exposent une œuvre d’art contribuent à l’échange d’idées et d’opinions indispensable à une société démocratique – d’où l’obligation, pour l’État, de ne pas empiéter indûment sur leur liberté d’expression (..)) [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am by Laya Maheshwari
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:37 am by WSLL
Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]