Search for: "State v. Thornton" Results 341 - 360 of 396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
The Ahmeds approached Mr Murphy in July 2008, stating that they wished to undertake extensive works of repair and refurbishment. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
The Ahmeds approached Mr Murphy in July 2008, stating that they wished to undertake extensive works of repair and refurbishment. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 28 October 2011 Sir Richard Buxton refused the defendant permission to appeal in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group (see Case Tracker). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Frank Cranmer
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900: “In my judgment, Section 8(1) of the 1900 Act imposes an enduring obligation to retain the new garden land as a public garden and integral part of the existing Victoria Tower Gardens. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am by John Rubin
Justice Newby of our Supreme Court discussed the movie’s criminal law implications in his concurring opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
In another recent decision, the court made plain that the definition of “defamatory” includes a “threshold of seriousness”: Thornton v Telegraph [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81])  As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
In 2011 LegalZoom stated, “We have served approximately 2 million customers over the last 10 years. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 – Action against persons not domiciled in the UK or an EU/Lugano Convention State Section 9 provides that the court will not have jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim where the prospective defendant is resident outside of the UK, European Union, or the Lugano Convention states (Norway, Switzerl [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Laws LJ) dismissed a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am by Andrew Voth
Drew Voth, Director at Grant Thornton LLP, is a Certified Public Accounta [read post]