Search for: "State v. Towers" Results 341 - 360 of 1,588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) Mr Ahmed had applied to Tower Hamlets (oddly named as ‘Hamlets’ in the reported judgment) as homeless. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 2:50 am by Patricia Salkin
The New York State Court of Appeals issued a decision on historic preservation regulations last month in Matter of Save America’s Clocks, Inc. v City of New York, 2019 WL 1385906 (N.Y. 3/28/2019). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Cesar Blanco also filed a related piece of legislation, HB 353, which essentially codifies the US Supreme Court case US v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 2:48 pm by Giles Peaker
Whilst various witnesses have expressed differing views as to the aesthetics of the tower, there can be no doubt that the unitised appearance of the glass facades, which depends upon there being no obvious externally visible fixings between the separate panels, is an important aspect of the overall design and original appearance of the building. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:51 pm
The intelligentsia stood marked as substantially out of touch (both of the left and the right and within ivory tower, think tanks and among the chattering classes who inhabit news and social media), and the fault lines of social, ethnic, religious, economic, and sub-national divisions became much clearer. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J heard an application in the case of Otuo v Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To support its argument, Moretrench cites the decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Chatham Towers, Inc. v Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. (151 AD3d 419 [I st Dept 2017]), which held that: “Common-law indemnification may be pursued by parties who have been held vicariously liable for the party that actually caused the negligence that injured the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm antitrust trial in San Jose (Northern District of California) obviously towers above all other events. [read post]