Search for: "Stone v. County"
Results 341 - 360
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
This is a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal from Central London County Court. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
A secure tenant could abandon or withdraw application for right to buy otherwise than by service of written notice under s.122(3) - Copping v Surrey County Council [2006] HLR 307 - or may "abandon or waive his right to buy under normal principles of common law and equity or may be estopped from continuing to exercise it", Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd [2006] HLR 763. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
A secure tenant could abandon or withdraw application for right to buy otherwise than by service of written notice under s.122(3) - Copping v Surrey County Council [2006] HLR 307 - or may "abandon or waive his right to buy under normal principles of common law and equity or may be estopped from continuing to exercise it", Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd [2006] HLR 763. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:14 pm
Stone v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:29 am
Rolling Stone, LLC, 209 F. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 10:26 am
In Venture-Newberg Perini Stone and Webster v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:48 pm
Our preview of the new cases concludes with Venture-Newberg Perini Stone & Webster v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
In the Mensing case, the Court's rationale was based on the assumption that the warning labels on generic drugs were somehow engraved in stone and could not be altered. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
"] From TGP Communications, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 4:38 pm
Ct., Los Angeles County Dec. 11, 2006). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Hardwick and Lawrence v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:52 am
See, Huxford v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
In Sackett v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:09 am
In Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:44 am
Taking away telecommuting privileges was an adverse action for a retaliation claim, but not for a discrimination claim (Stone v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm
The declaration of incompatibility in Wilson v County Trust [2003] All ER 229 had no force and there had been no parliamentary amendment. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm
The declaration of incompatibility in Wilson v County Trust [2003] All ER 229 had no force and there had been no parliamentary amendment. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm
In a civil suit filed in Clark County District Court last month, Mr. [read post]
