Search for: "Strauss v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Kansas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
It seems unlikely that such oppositions will be filed.CCF previously sought to intervene in Strauss v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 105 S.W.3d 244, 250 (Tex. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm
Keppler is a partner at Pierro, Connor & Strauss. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Strauss, W. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Strauss] will serve in that capacity until a permanent successor is in place. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
” State ex reI. 2 Dunlap v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis II Chair in Law Emeritus The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law David A. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:46 am
Since at least Bobbs-Merrill v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 8:17 pm
See Juan Carlos Abella v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green Patent… [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
The Court has not examined the state secrets privilege in more than 50 years. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
