Search for: "Supreme Court of Texas" Results 341 - 360 of 25,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am by Guest Author
The Supreme Court’s MQD case law has always been preoccupied with these kinds of legislative agency actions that prospectively bind regulated parties. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The California Supreme Court will issue a final ruling on the matter, which Eastman can appeal. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:42 am by INFORRM
When the second instance court overturned the decision, holding that the State was not liable, he appealed to the Supreme Federal Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:00 pm by Will Korn
The Texas Bar Foundation honored retired Supreme Court of Texas Justice Craig T. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
In the original case, the Texas Supreme Court vitiated the negligent infliction of emotional distress action it had approved just years earlier to vindicate a mother’s claim of anguish after a stillborn child was interred without her knowledge. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Ellena Erskine
Wade (Sara Chernikoff, USA Today) The Shameless Oral Arguments in the Supreme Court’s Abortion-Pill Case (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker)  A controversial Supreme Court decision could hurt Biden in November (John Blake, CNN) Supreme Court’s Texas Order Highlights Abuse of Dubious Shortcut (Will Havemann, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court Got It Wrong: Abortion Is Not Settled Law (Melissa Murray… [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:10 am by Charles Sartain
See those decisions for the history of how the Supreme Court got to where it is. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm by Ilya Somin
That, too, of course, might be reviewed by the en banc Fifth Circuit or by the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:08 am by Howard Bashman
The post “Supreme Court’s Texas Order Highlights Abuse of Dubious Shortcut” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Then-ABA President and future Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell warned almost 60 years ago: "it is essential that the basic policy of avoiding political involvement be strictly followed except where issues clearly involve the Association's primary responsibilities," arguing that delving into partisan politics "could jeopardize the Association's very existence. [read post]
The Supreme Court, in an earlier order, stayed the effect of all of the lower court decisions pending the outcome of the Supreme Court’s review of the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm by Mark Walsh
(This is unusual at the Supreme Court, where in recent years women argued less than a quarter of the cases before the justices.) [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm by Ilya Somin
Professor Philip Hamburger has posted a response to my critique of his post on the social media free speech cases currently before the Supreme Court. [read post]