Search for: "T-Mobile USA, Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 8:50 am
Department of Energy 82 Teach for America 83 Abbott 84 AT&T 85 MGM Mirage 86 Mayo Clinic 87 Lockheed Martin Corporation 88 Merck 89 Limited Brands 90 Hyatt Hotels and Resorts 91 Colgate-Palmolive Company 92 Dell Inc. 93 Lilly 94 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation 95 The Vanguard Group 96 Oracle 97 Vestas 98 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. 99 Honda Companies 100 [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:14 pm
USA, Inc., 583 F.3d 766, 777 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (2d Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit held that “Congress intended the usual and long-standing principles apply – post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by Matt C. Bailey
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2009), which “reasoned that (1) § 1332(d)(5)(B)’s jurisdictional limitation applies to ‘proposed’ classes; (2) ‘jurisdictional facts are assessed at the time of removal’; and (3) ‘post-removal events [(including non- or de-certification)] do not deprive federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
City officials decided to do an audit of the pagers’ use, obtaining transcripts of them from the service provider (Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc., now a part of USA Mobility Wireless, Inc — the nation’s largest provider of electronic paging services). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 522 F.3d 1299, 1306 (Fed. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
– Laura Malone of Associated Press speaks at FTC conference on future of news (Ars Technica) Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rules FCC had no right to sanction Comcast for P2P blocking (Ars Technica) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (IP Spotlight)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC rules AdWords doesn’t infringe bidding patent: Bid for Position, LLC v AOL, LLC et al (Ars Technica)   US Patents – Lawsuits and… [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:52 am by Michael C. Smith
T-Mobile USA Inc, 2:08cv441 (3/31/10)Holding: Motion to Transfer Venue DENIEDJudge: Chad Everingham    Defendant's motion to transfer venue was denied in this case, which has plaintiffs and a crossclaimant from Texas and a big old fight over patent ownership between Texas parties pending in Texas state court. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
Click Here Judge won’t block Denver Union Station construction. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:49 am by Gordon Smith
Much better than any mobile telephone I have used. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Claims containing ‘control means’ element were indefinite for failing to disclose ‘steps of Algorithm executed by the microprocessor’: Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Claims containing ‘control means’ element were indefinite for failing to disclose ‘steps of Algorithm executed by the microprocessor’: Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:05 am by The Docket Navigator
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 4-08-cv-00817 (OHND February 16, 2010, Order) (Adams, J.) [read post]