Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,716
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
It doesn’t make sense to give it up; pass it on to your nephew. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:17 am
People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
Even if the consumer can’t prove “actual damages,” he or she can recover statutory damages of up to $1,000 for “willful” violations. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Wrapping up, the Court said, "States cannot require a procedure that is inconsistent with the FAA, even if it is desirable for unrelated reasons. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am
So long as consumers don’t actually believe that Warby Parker is 1-800 Contacts, any consumer engagement with Warby Parker is pro-consumer competitive behavior. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:05 pm
The battle over the details of the GDPR has so far mostly been a debate between advocates pushing to better defend data protection, against companies and other interests that find consumer privacy laws a hindrance to their business models. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm
The Supreme Court has already announced it will take up the boundaries of Section 230 immunity this term in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
Supreme Court in ABC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
As to the common law claim, the court found that Syngenta wasn’t responsible for trespass just because it sold a product knowing that the product would end up interfering with the property of non-purchasers. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:11 am
Collins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:10 am
This invitation for action is perhaps unsurprising as data protection and consumer-focused regulators have been saying for some time now that product manufacturers have a crucial role to play in maintaining consumer privacy rights and ensuring compliance with data privacy laws. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:23 pm
(LabMD, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:47 pm
Indeed, sellers will in fact hold up the buyers ex post and extract those rents. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
It will be interesting to see whether the Court takes it up. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:07 am
” Ultimately, if companies don’t meet the January 1, 2023, deadline, the California Privacy Protection Agency can impose penalties of up to $7,500 per violation if children are involved or up to $2,500 per violation if children are not involved. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
Knowles v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
And here Justice Scalia’s words, citing U.S. v. [read post]
