Search for: "TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC."
Results 341 - 360
of 811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
The consumer benefits of the mandate are unclear. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 9:10 pm
“With our new high throughput offering, we can help food processors stay ahead of the constant E. coli testing cycle by streamlining their testing workflows and increasing productivity while helping to protect consumer safety in the global food chain. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:51 pm
LIRC (Beres), Appeal No. 2016AP1365, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Pennzoil Products Co., 305 F.3d 368, 372-74 (5th Cir. 2002) (not an FDCA case); Dial A Car, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:54 am
“Particularly given the technically savvy consumer base for the products at issue, a limitation contained in the title of the paper cannot give rise to a Lanham Act false advertising claim. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
FDA officials contend the public did not need to know about that aspect of the recall because the products were not available to, or identifiable by, consumers. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:21 am
Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm
The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), National Fire Protection Association Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:56 am
Proposition 12 reflects that shift in consumer preferences. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
Basically, it is a product or service that a consumer could reasonably expect a company to expand into selling. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
Third party selling or offers to sell products which used stolen IT are liable under the Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm
The deadline for responding has been expended to June 5 (Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:50 am
" Taken to the "absurd extreme," if third-party registrations alone were sufficient to prove relatedness of goods and services, "then virtually all consumer products and services would be related. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Apple Computer, Inc., 91 Cal.App.4th 224 (2001); Clothesrigger, Inc. v. [read post]
Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm
Ordinarily these authorized “first sales” would exhaust Lexmark’s patent rights in the cartridges, such that Lexmark could not sue third parties, such as Impression Products, Inc., for patent infringement when they refill and resell the spent cartridges at a reduced price. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:59 am
"In a statement, Erickson said FDA denied the petition on narrow technical grounds. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
Many simply go on and on, naively assuming that the more they say, the more they pile on the benefits which will make the herbal product, vitamin, or mineral more persuasive to the consumer. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See Quiksilver, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:56 am
March 17, 2017) (products liability class action lawsuit alleging defendant, a manufacturer of sports-oriented dietary supplement products, has marketed their products in a systematically misleading manner and these misrepresentations regarding ingredients and proper dosing have injured plaintiffs). [read post]
