Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA"
Results 341 - 360
of 10,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2023, 6:57 am
PhiladelphiaThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court has revised the test for determining proper venue by rejecting the ‘Percentage of Revenue’ venue defense. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:18 am
Today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania consists of a majority opinion and a dissenting opinion. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:51 am
Under Pennsylvania’s Frye analysis, the trial court still has a role in assessing the admissibility of expert testimony. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm
" … Last month, Judge McHugh dismissed plaintiff's defamation and tortious interference with business relations claim, but allowed the false light claim to go forward; but yesterday, the judge reconsidered that decision: In Pennsylvania, false light invasion of privacy "imposes liability on a person who publishes material that 'is not true, is highly offensive to a reasonable person, and is publicized with knowledge or in reckless disregard of its… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:19 pm
Misconduct at a Bench-Bar conference at the Seven Springs Mountain Resort drew a public reprimand of an attendee by the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
Matter of Peters, Matter of Peters, 34 A.D.3d 29 (Supreme Court New York, 2006). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
UPH proffers that a contrary interpretation would permit insurers to pay less than the benefit promised by withholding GCOP, and that this would, in effect, result in policyholders purchasing illusory coverage — something the law should not countenance.2 The Pennsylvania Supreme Court then noted that public policy should be taken up with the executive and legislative branches of government rather than the court. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
There has been an epic battle over the scope of religious liberty since 1990 when the Supreme Court decided Employment Division v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
According to the Times, Wilenchik himself wrote in an email that the Supreme Court filing was “to give legal ‘cover’ for the electors in AZ to ‘vote. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court nevertheless overturned his conviction. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Elections Michigan: “Judge Allows Trump on Michigan Primary Ballot as Critics Try to Bar Him” by Patrick Marley (Washington Post) for MSN Nebraska: “A Boom of Ballot Initiatives Is Reshaping This State’s Democracy” by Greg Jaffe (Washington Post) for MSN Ethics National: “House Ethics Panel Examines Change to Expand Legal Expense Fund Coverage” by Chris Marquette (Roll Call) for MSN Illinois: “Ethics Board Finds… [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Luksa, 269 A.2d 659 (Pa. 1970), noting that “the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania adopted §342 of the THE RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS to express the duty that landowners in this Commonwealth owed to business licensee, such as packaged deliverers…. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The post Today in Supreme Court History: November 14, 1922 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:56 pm
While Telebiao, Qingzhui, Baitiwu, and Shifachi are now in Xi’an Beilin Museum, Saluzi and Quanmaogua are in Pennsylvania. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
In the event of an appeal, the Pennsylvania Superior Court may review the case to ensure compliance with these statutes. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:11 pm
" The Supreme Court first discussed this limitation in Pickering v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm
The story predicted that the local race there could foreshadow results in the 2024 election, both in Pennsylvania and nationally.On Tuesday, Pennsylvania’s statewide election of Democrat Daniel McCaffery to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court garnered some national media attention. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Federal courts have long prohibited cameras in the courtroom, wary of feeding what the Supreme Court called a “carnival atmosphere” of publicity that could intimidate witnesses, sway jurors, or deprive criminal defendants of their due process rights. [read post]
