Search for: "Tam v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
” Pequignot v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 6:33 am
Williams v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
Tam (Trademarks) Petition for certiorari was denied in these four cases:Flute v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
” At the International Municipal Lawyer Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Artis v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:59 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:36 am
Schutte v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:38 am
Owen v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:01 pm
LaBovick & LaBovick is a Plaintiff's firm that represents whistleblowers in Florida and throughout the United States in qui tam (False Claims Act) litigation [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:28 pm
On June 2, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, in an unpublished opinion, the district court’s grant of summary judgment in US ex rel Arnold v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
Tam, … the case about the Asian-American rock band The Slants and their battle with the PTO to trademark their band name. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 6:20 pm
Ling, et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
A PAGA action is a form of qui tam action, and the FAA was not intended to preclude states from authorizing qui tam actions. [read post]
Judge Solis compares false marking to "someone who says, 'I am not married,' when indeed, they are."
22 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
VendEver LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:48 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking case for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:49 am
Josephs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
Rule 9(b) states that "[i]n alleging fraud or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
The definition of public disclosure was recently addressed in the case of United States, et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
The positions in this brief are somewhat surprising because the United States interests are generally aligned with false marking qui tam relators. [read post]
