Search for: "Tennessee v. Virginia"
Results 341 - 360
of 592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm
The others were in Kentucky and Virginia. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Another variant is "authorized (with or without adjectives) (Illinois, Michigan, Tennessee, Virginia), or alternatively "authorized or approved" (Kentucky). [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
By contrast, at least six states–Florida, Mississippi, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia–expressly provide for the exemption of HSAs. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In a 42-page complaint for damages and injunctive relief, trademark attorneys for Sprint Solutions, Inc. of Reston, Virginia; Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Boost Worldwide, Inc., the latter two of Overland Park, Kansas (collectively, "Sprint") sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Reginald Aldridge and Arrice Aldridge, both of Park Forest, Illinois, and Damion Transou of Humboldt, Tennessee infringed certain Sprint trademarks. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Tennessee 13-5086Issue: (1) Whether, in proceedings under Atkins v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Virginia. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:09 am
The case is Wolff Ardis, P.C. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
Kelly v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:16 pm
Hamilton Beach listed on the purchase order its facility in Tennessee as the shipping address and its office in Virginia as the billing address. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
LEXIS 113028 (WD TN, Aug. 12, 2013), a Tennessee federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2013 U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:45 pm
Mountain V is a privately company that set out to acquire and develop oil and gas reserves in the Appalachian Basin of Tennessee, Kentucky and West Virginia. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:13 pm
This case, Cisson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
Later cases like Hibbs and Tennessee v. [read post]
