Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 18,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 9:09 am by R. Taj Moore
Al Odah could be transferred to Afghan authorities before or as soon as active hostilities end or, though it is not explicitly mentioned in the opinion, there could be some new basis for his detention following the conclusion of active hostilities. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
The two active petitions for certiorari in military justice cases (United States v. [read post]
The common law principles of state immunity allows foreign countries to plead state immunity, the USA could have pleaded state immunity from the outset, however in this case it failed to do so. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
The active military cert petitions are Fry v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Supreme Court - Thursday, May 14, 2009Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:40 pm
An "arriving alien" is an alien seeking admission to or to travel through the United States, at a port of entry, or an alien who is seized in international or United States waters and brought into the United States by any means, whether or not to a designated port-of-entry, and regardless of the means of transport. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:10 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
 What is noteworthy has been the grant of three cases in which it was the client who raised an issue through a United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As the United States is a party to these instruments, it must address the activities of vulture funds that violate the rights enshrined in them. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:58 pm by Embassy Law
On July 27, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City ruled in favor of Germany in confirming the dismissal of claims for old East German debentures by adding as a basis for dismissal the lack of allegations of commercial activities by state actors. [read post]