Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 341 - 360 of 7,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
 Pix Credit: William Blake (British, 1757–1827) The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed in Sun (Rev. 12: 1–4), ca. 1803–1805 – Brooklyn Museum The progress of the demonification of Donald Trump continues apace (for an early sense about the arc of this perhaps inevitable passion, see As the Trump Administration Fades into the Shadows of History (and Myth) Lessons Left Unlearned (8 November 202).Donald Trump has been indicted for a third time this year by a… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As you have heard, the rules require issuers to file an 8-K to report cybersecurity incidents within four business days after the registrant determines that it has experienced a material cybersecurity incident. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 19 July to 221 July 2023 the trial in the case of Ijaz v Manan was heard by Linden J. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:46 am by Will Newman
Amber Heard trial (and the Dominion lawsuit and the Carrol v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
  Reserved Judgments Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) Smith v Backhouse, heard on 11 July 2023 (Asplin, Arnold and [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jennifer Davis
” He also cited the earlier Court ruling in a similar case, Fletcher v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
This is not the first, (or even the second) hearing in which I have heard Mr Davidoff make this submission. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]