Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 341 - 360 of 6,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:33 pm by emp
But, in the case of people using networks, at what point does it cross the line into violations of personal privacy? [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am by Matthew Weybrecht
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
 However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Eboni Nelson
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]