Search for: "The People v. Harper" Results 341 - 360 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2010, 6:17 am by M Bates
Review in detail the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:10 am by azatty
How could I have slogged through Pennoyer v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas jury invalidates one of EFF’s ‘most wanted’ patents: Bright Response LLC v Google, Yahoo! [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Michael Scutt
  People queued and camped to get their hands on these devices. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
I suspect, for instance, that the ban on even very low poll taxes as to the right to vote — to the extent that the ban stems less from application of strict scrutiny in Harper v. [read post]