Search for: "Thomas Read" Results 341 - 360 of 16,088
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2024, 7:55 am by Dan Farber
Justice Thomas wrote the opinion, and maybe that is what he had in mind. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
I thought that the scholars who read Casey in this way were mistaken, but we need not dwell on that point. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm by Josh Blackman
" Seven months later, now having read the Supreme Court's Rahimi decision, I stand by what I wrote. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:27 pm by Josh Blackman
 For a basic 1L ConLaw class, it is probably enough to read Chief Justice Roberts's majority opinion, Justice Jackson's concurrence, and Justice Thomas's dissent. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
Opposition to the Act was so widespread that no one was ever successfully deported under it, before Thomas Jefferson allowed it to expire after becoming president. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:42 am
I'm reading "New York’s Fat Beach Day gives plus-size people a space to be themselves/Jacob Riis Beach hosts the day of body positivity and fun, in the city at the heart of the fat acceptance movement" (The Guardian).I didn't know that fat acceptance was part of what Pride month is about or that New York had something it wanted to call its "activism space. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:26 am by SHG
Granted, there was little clarity under Heller and McDonald, Justice Scalia having tossed in the errant paragraph that undermined any coherent reading of the rest of the opinion. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
He was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Barrett. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” More to Read The post Will latest Supreme Court decision affect California bans on assault weapons, magazines? [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:46 pm by Josh Blackman
On my initial read, I am more persuaded by Justice Thomas's dissent, which provides a thorough-yet-readable account of that history. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
” Justice Clarence Thomas averred that the “public purpose” approach violated both the most natural reading of the Public Use Clause and the intent of the Framers. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
Justice Thomas pointed out that the rule is a narrow exception to the general allowance of expert testimony on ultimate issues. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
Justice Thomas pointed out that the rule is a narrow exception to the general allowance of expert testimony on ultimate issues. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
Justice Thomas pointed out that the rule is a narrow exception to the general allowance of expert testimony on ultimate issues. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Everyone who cares about American higher education should read it. [read post]