Search for: "Thomas v. Brennan"
Results 341 - 352
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 3:33 pm
The Court noticed this in Texas Monthly v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas are clear votes in favor of overruling. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas are clear votes in favor of overruling. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
Scalia and Thomas have a clear and large-scale vision for constitutional law, in which (for example) affirmative action is abolished, Roe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:49 am
The most important example is the willingness of Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Sclaia and Thomas to sign the per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:01 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:21 pm
(It's possible Justice Thomas might also be inclined to a theory along these lines, but he did not ask any questions.) [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 11:28 pm
To be sure, he didn't embrace the living Constitution as such, but nearly all of what he said as a matter of general jurisprudence could have been said by Ginsburg or Stevens, and much of it by Brennan or Marshall. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
(My discussion of Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Bowers, Frederick Boyce, Chris Boyd, Heather Boyer, Kent Boyer, Dennis Boyle, Carl Brackpool, Jon Bradley, Darin Brannan, Aaron Bratrude, Rich Braun, Michael Breault, John Brehm, Chuck Brennan, Craig Brenner, Will Briegel, Ludy Brito, Paul Chandler Britton, Jeannine Broadwell, David Brogden, Sean Brophy, Brady Brosnahan, David Brouda, Hilary Brown, Kayenta Brown, Matthew Brown, Monika Brown, Roger L. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 3:52 pm
This question occurred to me when I recently reread Dickerson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 6:19 am
[Madeira v. [read post]
