Search for: "Thomas v. Cornell" Results 341 - 354 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Ø Set for argument April 22, 2009Ø SCOTUS docket hereØ SCOTUSwiki hereØ Cornell Law School/LII hereØ Noted here: ABC News; ABA Journal; NYTimes; WSJ; SCOTUSblog (argument preview); Discriminations; ACS (as noted at Workplace Prof Blog)Selected Cases Pending Cert: Grubb v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46)   Greece Well-known MOUYER trade… [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
If you would like more information on cerebral palsy please visit our website and as always, if you have any questions please feel free to contact me: E-mail: robert@dioriofirm.com Phone: (888) 456-4658 US VIRGIN ISLANDS STATE RESOURCES AGING ADA Regional ADA Technical Agency Northeast ADA & IT Center Cornell University 331 Ives Hall Ithaca, NY 14853 Phone: (607) 255-6686 (V/TTY/Spanish); (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Spanish/Toll Free) E-mail:… [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.The opinions in the case are available from Cornell's LII here. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 9:31 pm
Alito, Jr., Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2003, 10:23 am
[JURIST] Breaking news from DC Supreme Court litigators Goldstein & Howe [SCOTUSBlog post] - the US Supreme Court issued two decisions shortly after 10 AM ET this morning [links to Opinions courtesy Cornell's Legal Information Institute]: In Woodford v. [read post]