Search for: "Thomas v. Stevens" Results 341 - 360 of 2,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that during oral argument in this week’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Then there are quasi-biographies such as those by Thomas Healy (2013, pp. 336) and Brad Snyder (2017, pp. 824). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Panel - Policy Surveillance for Public Health Advancement Moderator: Benjamin Meier, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jamie Chriqui, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health Steven Hoffman, Osgoode Hall Law School Nadia Sawicki, Loyola University Chicago School of Law B. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Another preview comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Problems with Justice Thomas’s OriginalismJustice Thomas’s critique of Times v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:26 am by Joel Goldstein
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, which Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie covers the court’s decision Tuesday in Timbs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Thaddeus Stevens,18 wanted to grant freed slaves full civil rights, both out of moral sentiment and to create a Republican power base.19 The “black codes”20 and laws that denied freedmen entry into the states21 hampered the Radicals’ goals, as did Supreme Court precedent favoring states rights (often regarding slavery).22 After President Johnson vetoed23 a civil rights bill24 that would have eliminated the black codes, Stevens sought to usurp power from the… [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Just today, Justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh suggested that they would be open to revisiting this question, and to reversing Employment Division v. [read post]