Search for: "Tucker v. US" Results 341 - 360 of 652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
” At the Federal Convention, on August 18, Madison had proposed that Congress be empowered “to encourage by premiums & provisions, the advancement of useful knowledge and discoveries,” but his proposition had not been adopted. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And after the Supreme Court granted cert in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:23 am by Eric Goldman
* Catherine Tucker: Why do consumers hate paying by the mile or the minute so much? [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:56 pm by Ben Rubin
 Both sides agree that:  (i) the City leased the airport property to the United States in 1941 to support the war effort, (ii) the United States made substantial improvements to the property, (iii) the United States terminated the lease in 1948, (iv) the 1948 instrument terminating the lease contained a reversionary clause, and (v) the reversionary clause is triggered if any property that was transferred by the instrument is "used, leased, sold, salvaged, or disposed of… [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by Don Cruse
Attorney’s fees are not proper in child-support modification orders ROSSCER CRAIG TUCKER, II v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
Moreover, the practical difficulties with the “arise” view can be avoided through the use of acting officers (in many cases) and by the President’s constitutional power “on extraordinary Occasions,” to call the Senate into session when it is in recess. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:58 am by Joy Waltemath
” The technicians argued that Tucker’s services were resold — their installation services were sold to Charter, which in turn used them to service its own customers. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  This one gets less play than the others – perhaps because of how courts sometimes use “communication” to get around it in non-prescription medical product cases (more on that to come), or sometimes because plaintiffs might use the same testimony to claim medical malpractice.But prescriber failure to read can be a powerful tool. [read post]