Search for: "Two Right-of-Way Easements"
Results 341 - 360
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 3:14 pm
Kelley was never a party to these right-of-way agreements granting an easement between her property and Route 32. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:37 am
Many interesting legal theories: an easement by necessity to get access to your “property”—is that a credible argument or are you risking sanctions? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:22 am
Or patronize two of ATL’s advertisers, BarMax and/or Themis Bar Review.That’s all; all the information is there. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
However, the company now faces the challenge of whether the statutory framework in Michigan will in fact give ITC the authority to condemn land for a right-of-way. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:08 am
There is, therefore, clear distinction between the two concepts. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:56 am
The Appellants purchased their property in 1964.Two decades ago, a Consent Decree and Judgment recognized Appellee’s easement and right-of-way across the Appellants’ land for the purpose of access to, and maintenance of, its irrigation facilities. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:24 am
Unfortunately, so few people know the right way to shovel snow. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
Late in the day, we were proven all too right. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:49 am
Specifically, I propose that courts recognize a reliance interest, similar to an easement, which gives a municipality a legally enforceable right against corporate entities that benefit from economic development takings. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am
Two of the most important of those are: “Once a road, always a road;” and, where a road is created by a statutory procedure such as that in play here, such a road cannot be abandoned, vacated, or disestablished without there being clear action on the part of the governmental entity that created the road to vacate, abandon, or disestablish it. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Public access to information on private land conservation: tracking conservation easements. 2009 Wis. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:37 pm
The Marvins’ land comprises two-thirds of the Haena kuleana, which is located in the Pila’a ahupua’a. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
The key difference between adverse possession and prescriptive easements involves the nature of the right that is obtained under those two doctrines. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:32 pm
For example, the Court said the following: With regard to the miles of right-of-way subject to private conveyances, plaintiffs argue the individual deeds can be placed in groups based on common conveyance language and the court can decide motions for partial summary judgment with respect to each group on the fee versus easement issue. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
There are two main types of condemnation proceedings. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
Six justices concluded that in the right circumstances, a decision by a state supreme court would violate the takings or due process clauses, while the remaining two justices concluded that some future case might be the right vehicle to decide whether a court decision could take property. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
"These bills achieve that goal and will increase confidence in New York's consumers and provide valuable information to keep individuals spending their hard-earned money right here in New York. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:05 pm
Start with the extreme and work your way back: would it be if a government regulation required a building owner to leave her property vacant? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm
I believe the answer to the question of whether an adjustment of property rights as between two private parties can be a judicial taking has to be no. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Scotchmer: Two views of open source licensing. [read post]
