Search for: "U. S. v. Loane" Results 341 - 360 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the hard lesson learned by the 49% LLC member in Lard-PT, LLC v Seokoh, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51208(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 20, 2020], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok denied the 49% member’s summary judgment motion based on findings that put the 51% member on a winning path. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
In other instances, consignors need to negotiate with the gallery’s bank to exclude the art they consign from the bank’s loan collateral. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:31 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
 Id. at 5 (“[U]nless the challenge is to the arbitration clause itself, the issue of the contract’s validity is considered by the arbitrator in the first instance. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 10:12 pm
Customers are therefore not informed of the true cost of the loan the bank makes when they overdraw. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:19 am by Jan von Hein
Lehmann: Locating Financial Loss and Collective Actions in Case of Defective Investor Information: The CJEU’s Judgment in VEB v BP For the first time, the CJEU has ruled in VEB v BP on the court competent for deciding liability suits regarding misinformation on the secondary securities market. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Obviously, the costs for those who attend U of T and Osgoode will be significantly above these amounts; by nearly $55,000 for U of T and about $25,000 for Osgoode. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
In Sobol v Les Pieds Nickels, Inc., the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the lower court’s denial of the respondent shareholder’s request for permission to file an untimely election made eight years after the dissolution proceeding’s commencement. [read post]