Search for: "U. S. v. Parente" Results 341 - 360 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
 Because the standards for insanity are extraordinarily high, and contrast in a plethora of substantive ways with defenses on the merits like imperfect self-defense.)Here's a pretty good summary of the holding, from page 11 of Justice Corrigan's opinion:"[U]nreasonable self-defense, as a form of mistake of fact, has no application when the defendant's actions are entirely delusional. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 10:12 pm
See Matt McCaughey, And a Child Shall Lead Them: The Validity of Children’s Consent to Warrantless Searches of the Family Home, 34 U. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm by Evan M. Levow
” DWI is not considered a “crime of violence,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Leocal v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:41 pm by Evan M. Levow
” DWI is not considered a “crime of violence,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Leocal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
As in Parents Involved, the Gang of 5 choose to ignore the Nation;s history of discrimination. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
  In an op-ed for the U-T San Diego, Harold Johnson criticizes the Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:29 am by Richard Diamond
” This issue (not exercising custody rights) was addressed earlier this year by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Abbott v Abbott. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Johnson, Compensating Parents for the Loss of Their Nonfatally Injured Child’s Society: Extending the Notion of Consortium to the Filial Relationship, 1989 U. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Melissa Crow
The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Shareholder of Parent Corporation Has Standing to Sue Derivatively to Remove Subsidiary’s Director But Not for Dissolution Elting v Shawe, 2014 NY Slip Op 32126(U) [Sup Ct, NY County July 24, 2014]. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Les parents d’un garçon atteint d’un trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA) peuvent-ils réclamer de la commission scolaire des dommages-intérêts de 600 000 $ parce que celui-ci n’a pas reçu les services adéquats? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
As for the fact that the witnesses were the defendant's parents, the Court stated, "(U)nder our precedents, the presentation of reputation evidence by a criminal defendant is a matter of right, not discretion, once a proper foundation has been laid. [read post]