Search for: "U.S. v. Battle*"
Results 341 - 360
of 612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 12:52 pm
On July 11, 2013, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Sec’y of U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm
(My curt analysis of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875), and Plessy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
The U.S. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
This thumbnail sketch provides key context for understanding post-9/11 debates regarding the constitutionality of military detention for U.S. citizens. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm
First, according to the Court in the Kiobel decision, ATS cases are subject to the presumption against extraterritoriality recently rearticulated in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am
While all that was going on, a remarkably similar issue was being argued to the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:02 am
North Dakota, the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
, 2013 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
Haley Although concluding that Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Here are three permutations, though there are more: First, a court to review and approve all targeted lethal force by the U.S. government away from any so-called “hot battlefield,” against a terrorist, including in the course of a congressionally-authorized armed conflict conducted by the U.S. military; Second, a court to review and approve targeted lethal force by the U.S. government away from the “hot battlefield,” but only… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
We've been informed by counsel that the Dobbs litigation - the case that brought us Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Since many U.S. actions using lethal force would constitute murder or other crimes during peacetime, this is actually a pivotal point. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am
” Pakistani Intelligence Announces Its Full Cooperation With U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
Note here Quirin and Hamdi's reference to clearly established and universally accepted law-of-war principles in finding the president's use of the military constitutional.The paper does acknowledge that procedural due process can limit the president's authority to use military force against a U.S. citizen, citing Hamdi and its invocation of the Matthews v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
As the Supreme Court ruled in Hamdi v. [read post]
