Search for: "U.S. v. Bunch" Results 341 - 360 of 657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
Are the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases about employee health insurance plan coverage of contraception, writ large, or—as the plaintiffs in those two cases would have it—“only” about coverage of “abortifacients,” or about four discrete forms of birth control? [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
” After attending the oral arguments, Matt D. discussed an update in the FOIA case New York Times v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The truth often is that, for one reason or another, the prescribing physician did not rely on the particular warning in question, and thus a different one wouldn’t have made any difference.There are a number of fact patterns that lead to physician non-reliance, the golden boy of the bunch being when a doctor (a trained professional, after all) already knew about the risk in question and thus did not need to be warned about it. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm by Michael Lowe
Federal Government Argues That Smartphones Have No Expectation of Privacy and Police Are Free to Surf Your Phone Holder and his attorneys are telling the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:59 am by Anna Gelpern
Supreme Court urging review of the Second Circuit decision in NML v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by Venkat
Rather than spike Venkat's post, I decided to expand it by doing a recap of a bunch of other cases I'd been sitting on for the past year. [read post]