Search for: "UNITED STATES CELLULAR" Results 341 - 360 of 1,174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2018, 10:32 pm by Florian Mueller
" And indeed, timing was outcome-determinative, for the time being: Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California based her decision on the Supreme Court's 2013 holding in Clapper, a case in which Amnesty International and others expressed fears over the federal government, under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), intercepting communications between U.S. citizens and foreigners in ways that would infringe on some… [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 11:33 am
  The Constitution of The United States of America (then 13 states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina) was negotiated in Pennsylvania between May to September 1787. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:07 pm by William K. Berenson
And almost 6,000 pedestrians died in the United States in 2016, the highest number in 20 years. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:17 am by Daniel Cappetta
United States – the United States Supreme Court ruled that under the Fourth Amendment, the government must obtain a warrant supported by probable cause in order to procure from a telecommunication company the historical cell-site location information (CSLI) for a cellular telephone. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:52 pm by Robert S. Litt and Sophia M. Brill
United States, in which the Court held that the government must obtain a warrant to acquire customer location information maintained by cellular service providers, at least where that information covers a period of a week or more. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This year, we requested and were granted a nine-month contract, enabling us to pursue our dream of cycling across the United States, from Washington, D.C., to Astoria, Oregon. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 5:38 pm by Tilem & Associates
The court began its analysis by stating that cellular phones have become a necessity in today’s culture, and noted that there are almost 400 million cellular phone accounts in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am by Rosemary McKenna
United States, the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal government would need a warrant in order to obtain historical location data from cellular service providers, based on cell tower “pings. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am by Rosemary McKenna
United States, the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal government would need a warrant in order to obtain historical location data from cellular service providers, based on cell tower “pings. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:34 pm by Orin Kerr
United States raises lots of fascinating and novel Fourth Amendment questions. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am by Orin Kerr
United States raises lots of fascinating and novel Fourth Amendment questions. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:08 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In a recent United States Supreme Court opinion, the Court reversed the lower court’s ruling that denied a defendant’s motion to suppress the historical location data obtained by the police from the defendant’s cellular phone provider. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:08 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In a recent United States Supreme Court opinion, the Court reversed the lower court’s ruling that denied a defendant’s motion to suppress the historical location data obtained by the police from the defendant’s cellular phone provider. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Dan Harris
The other side was ___________[Company X] from the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:05 pm by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in a Fourth Amendment privacy case that will have a major effect on Massachusetts criminal investigations. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:05 pm by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in a Fourth Amendment privacy case that will have a major effect on Massachusetts criminal investigations. [read post]