Search for: "US v. Anderson" Results 341 - 360 of 2,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2022, 4:07 pm by NARF
Anderson (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Federal Recognition; Tribal Government) Campos v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:28 am by John Gregory
The Utah Supreme Court this week held that electronic signatures gathered through a web site were valid signatures for the purpose of nominating a person to run for elected office: Anderson v Bell 2010 UT 47 June 22, 2010. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Such allegations sound in negligent misrepresentation and are analogous to the inaccurate findings that the Court of Appeals found to be actionable in Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, (73 NY2d 417 [1989]). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:33 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I have just now been forwarded a copy of the 2nd Circuit opinion released today in Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
"    This is the very same nonsensical victim-blaming rhetoric  the Supreme Court used more than a hundred years ago in  Plessy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 5:29 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
” The lawsuit, filed in November 2004, was assigned to Federal District Court Judge Wayne Anderson of the Northern District of Illinois and Magistrate Judge Susan Cox, and is captioned EEOC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:30 pm
Tibbie McIntyre reports on The 1709 Blog on a number of items, including the declaration of fair use filed by the Andy Warhol estate against Lynn Goldsmith regarding Warhol’s Prince Series; the settlement reached by singer Ed Sheeran and songwriters Martin Harrington and Thomas Leonard in connection with the song ‘Photograph’; the case Mavrix Photographs v LiveJournal, No. 14-56596, which considered whether the safe harbor defense applies to moderators who review… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am by H. Scott Leviant
Rules of Court, rule 8.548), we agreed to answer the following question:  Does the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. [read post]