Search for: "US v. David Jones"
Results 341 - 360
of 732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
In Husted v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Here's the latest on the expert analysis of the software: While CMI, the Intoxilyzer 5000 manufacturer, has yet to provide us reasonable access, Marsh Halberg, one of the other lead attorneys, has made significant progress. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Patja Howell shared the latest installment of the Culper Partners Rule of Law Series on the Lawfare Podcast, in which Nate Jones and David Kris spoke with former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick: Fogel shared a petition for rehearing en banc from the appellant in McKeever v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Some of us saw it coming, twenty years ago. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 4:18 am
Former Solicitor General Noel Francisco is rejoining the Washington office of Jones Day, Sam Skolnik reports for Bloomberg Law. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:19 pm
 The other papers in this section are real dynamite and include William Birdthistle on Jones v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
Ok, just a bit further… Mark Herrmann, former contributor to the wildly successful Drug and Device Law Blog, sent me a note the other day that his book co-authored with Jones Day Partner David B. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
Bell in 1994.In addition, Arnot said he is extremely pleased with the SCC’s decision, adding “words have power, and this power demands that each of us uses this power responsibility and within reasonable limits. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Jones? [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
Jones. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Jones cannot be applied retroactively. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am
Jones presiding. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
In ABC, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am
And the promise to “prevent your employees” from providing such assistance is laughable – unenforceable and, if it were taken seriously, would require signatories to engage in activity that also surely inconsistent with US labor law (“Sorry, Jones, but we have to let you go, because you violated my directive not to assist in Hillary Clinton’s campaign …”) It’s the product, in my opinion, of some pretty lousy lawyering. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
” Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
