Search for: "US v. David Jones" Results 341 - 360 of 733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
Juliet Eilperin and David Nakamura of the Washington Post ponder how President Obama’s political capital has fallen so far just two years after his second nationwide electoral victory. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
" In Hollywood, these plaintiffs attorneys are often portrayed as Davids to their opposing Goliaths of corrupt industry. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells shared comments from David Remes, a defense lawyer in Hatim v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Judge adopted the magistrate report, especially in light of the Sixth Circuit’s Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:40 am by Kristen J. Mathews
Jones, which held that installing a GPS device on a vehicle and using the device to track the vehicle constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
David Vitter (R-La.), top Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee sent a letter to Jim Jones, Assistant Administrator of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
United States On 16 June 2014, in the case of Sarah Jones v Dirty World Entertainment [pdf] the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a libel judgment in favour of a former cheerleader for the Cincinnati Bengals Football Team. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by Katharine Goodloe
Jones, which held the use of a GPS tracking device to monitor a car is a search protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:58 am by Katharine Goodloe
Jones, which held the use of a GPS tracking device to monitor a car is a search protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]