Search for: "US v. Hopkins" Results 341 - 360 of 708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by INFORRM
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial of Monroe v Hopkins was heard on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, 27 and 28 February and 1 March 2017. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Hopkins, that sex stereotyping is a form of intentional sex discrimination that violates Title VII, the broad employment discrimination law. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 February 2017, Warby J will hear the much anticipated trial in the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am by INFORRM
The case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins concerns a tweet by the defendant, Daily Mail columnist, Katie Hopkins about the claimant, food writer Jack Monroe, sent on 18 May 2015. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has concluded that president-elect Donald Trump is “unlikely to sue” in the UK or US after BuzzFeed published a research dossier about him. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:52 am by INFORRM
Todary v Westbourne Cars Ltd  6 February 2017, 4 day trial Jack Munro v Katie Hopkins  27 February 2017, 2 day trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Pryor has participated in many decisions associated with death penalty petitioners (writing 28 reported decisions by our estimation), far too many for us to describe here in any detail. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Anthony Fairclough (Matrix), Emma Boffey, Lisa Fox, and Diane Jerry (from CMS) as well as Cathryn Hopkins, Ryan Dolby-Stevens and Tom Pritchard (all from Olswang). 16.10 Lord Neuberger thanks all the court staff and lawyers for their hard work in bringing the case. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
Lord Neuberger commented that the principle emerging from this case was that the prerogative power cannot be used to undermine rights or obligations. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Hopkins’ holding that gender discrimination in Title VII can extend to certain situations where the plaintiff fails to conform to stereotypical gender norms. [read post]