Search for: "US v. King"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
King; Judge E. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
So this is another major problem with King Allan’s claim to the throne via almost 2000 years of “unbroken primogeniture”; he’s not telling us what he thinks he can prove, it’s not clear what exactly he would have to prove, and that’s setting aside his almost-certain lack of any evidence to prove it. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:23 pm
The Facts and The HoldingHughes v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:00 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:28 pm
” The case cite is King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:56 am
The R (Bridges) v South Wales Police case A key test case on the use of FRS has been heard by the Administrative Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:06 pm
So much of the time, the resistance between legal marketer and lawyer has to do with the disparity of our roles: Lawyer v. marketer Partner v. staff Baby boomer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Colombo v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:29 am
’The case is 1:22-cv-04421, Koch et al v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:36 am
On this day in history, King George V changed the name of the British Royal House from the “House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha” to the “House of Windsor. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:38 pm
” Cites to King v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:14 am
The case is Maryland v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
King Pharmaceuticals (Westlaw cite is 2006 WL 3716920), and the case number is WDQ-04-3521The blog had noted: the Court [in Merck v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
But the main target is New York Times Co v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:57 am
See Chief Judge Kozinski’s concurrence in Bull v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:34 pm
Ahmach (King County Dist. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:33 am
Jones Jr represents a very unusual use of Judiciary Law 487. [read post]
