Search for: "US v. Nixon"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Nixon after that. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law and former LHB Guest Blogger is up on the BBC History Extra with A brief history of US abortion law, before and after Roe v Wade. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
See California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
Republicans like to blame the Warren Court for everything they don’t like but it was the Burger Court, with four Nixon appointees, that decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Pozen may be right that the veto is exercised with diminished frequency (as is the case, incidentally, also with the use of the presidential pardoning power), but it is scarcely absent from our political system at this very instant. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Perhaps this is evidence that, as Lena Salaymeh has persistently reminded us this year, law remains in urgent need of decolonization. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
American Institute for International Steel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
" Nixon, 418 U.S. at 693. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
— about a federal judge named Nixon who challenged the procedure the Senate used to convict him. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
” Since the likelihood today is that the two highest-profile cases testing new laws as forbidden “bills of attainder” both involve President Trump or his Administration in one way or another, it is useful to note that the Supreme Court went the furthest to spell out the meaning of the clause in a famous decision in 1977, Nixon v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
In both cases, the resolution granted several specific powers to the committee for it to use in the course of completing the investigation with which it was charged by the full House. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
” He referred to the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon and the Whitewater investigation of President Bill Clinton. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am
Nor did Franklin v. [read post]
