Search for: "US v. Strange"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
At the Originalism Blog, University of San Diego law professor Michael Ramsey has some thoughtful commentary on a recent presentation I gave on the original meaning of public use, which was based on a chapter of a book I am currently working on, tentatively entitled The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
People get injured in very strange, and sometime very serious (often catastrophic) ways in the use or operating of golf carts. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Last week, Mr Justice Floyd delivered his judgment in the case of ratiopharm & Sandoz v Napp Pharmaceuticals, but the IPKat has been taking a while to digest this very long and complicated judgment. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Scene V. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Khanjee Holding (US) Inc., 655 F.3d 699, 704 (7th Cir. 2011). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
This morning the Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision (PDF here) in a strange case that many privacy scholars had watched closely, Sorell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:36 am
Shoe Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Assn. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 pm
Speaking of Gronstal and One Iowa, he said that "[t]o deny us the right to vote is un-American, it’s anti-democratic and it’s strange that they would submit to a dictator, even if that dictator is temporarily on their side of action. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:23 am
US v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
The case of Capato v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:19 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others [2011] EWCA Civ 808 In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see the UK Human Rights Blog contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to have been on the side of the angels. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm
The majority wisely explained: “The better analogy to this case is Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 4:02 am
It's now 13 years since Lord Hoffmann told us definitively how to interpret patents claims, in his opinion in Kirin Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2005] 1 All ER 667. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
