Search for: "USA v. Wolfe"
Results 341 - 360
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that if the challengers to the cy pres practice prevail, “[t]he justices aren’t likely to go beyond setting broad standards for lower court judges to follow. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that Kavanaugh’s appearance at the ceremony “follows a whirlwind weekend in which he was confirmed by the Senate, sworn in, hired law clerks and assembled his high court chambers. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
” Briefly: For USA Today, Richard Wolf explains why so many issues and even cases that land before the justices are repeat performers, suggesting that “[a]mong the court’s self-inflicted reasons for repetition is … Roberts’ penchant for deciding only what must be decided, and no more. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Mark Sherman at AP, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, and Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, who reports that “several justices were concerned that there was no obvious formula for determining when a fine was excessive. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
News), Richard Wolf of USA Today, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Bob Barnes and Amber Phillips of The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” Richard Wolf reports for USA Today that “[a]fter an hour’s debate in court, it appeared possible the justices could rule McKinney deserves a new trial court sentencing to assess mitigating factors such as his childhood abuse, but not before a jury. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
” Additional coverage comes from Bill Mears at Fox News, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Nina Totenberg at NPR, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, and Richard Wolf for USA Today. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
I covered the case for this blog; other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the impact of the decision not only for the North Carolina landowners directly involved in the case, but also for veterans and their families seeking to recover for injuries caused by contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:18 am
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court’s conservative justices show support for religious schools in landmark Montana case. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:42 am
In its 2014 ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am
” At The Narrowest Grounds, Asher Steinberg discusses his earlier post on Lockhart v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:32 am
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews next week’s oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 4:30 pm
” John Fritze of USA Today has an article headlined “‘Wolf in sheep’s clothing’? [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court skeptical of California law requiring information about abortion. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:49 am
” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf looks at the Justices’ views on statutory interpretation and what they might mean for King v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 5:32 pm
” Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court appears sympathetic to death row prisoner who cannot remember his crime. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf profiles Jim Obergefell, the lead plaintiff in the Kentucky case, recounting how a “mild-mannered real estate broker and art collector . . . bec[a]me the poster child for the gay rights movement’s nationwide effort to legalize same-sex marriage. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:42 pm
Supreme Court in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
