Search for: "USPTO"
Results 341 - 360
of 19,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 6:21 am
“LEAP to Chambers” brings eligible practitioners to a USPTO hearing facility, where a PTAB judge will give them a behind-the-scenes tour. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:20 pm
While the USPTO’s examiner guidance doesn’t constitute substantive rulemaking, it traces 15 years of case law from the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:20 pm
While the USPTO’s examiner guidance doesn’t constitute substantive rulemaking, it traces 15 years of case law from the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:33 am
Even though […] The post USPTO Announces Webinar on Avoiding Trademark Scams appeared first on Privacy and IP Law Blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 11:15 am
The USPTO gave itself wide berth in applying this new guidance, stating there is no bright-line test as to what constitutes a human’s significant contribution to inventorship. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
by Dennis Crouch Earlier this week, the USPTO published updated examination guidelines regarding obviousness determinations under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rulemaking process. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rulemaking process. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:34 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark TABLEAU for wine, finding confusion likely with the identical mark registered for "restaurant and bar services; cocktail lounges. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
Instead the USPTO simply granted the revival. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:39 am
Check out the USPTO's page on their Artificial Intelligence initiative and their Inventorship guidance for AI-assisted inventions webinar - through USPTO. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:27 am
Michael Hall, a former examining attorney and now Senior Counsel at Womble Bond Dickinson, provides (pdf here) three recommendations for trademark practitioners to consider when preparing responses to Office Actions, followed by two recommendations for the USPTO with regard to improving its examination of applications. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:18 pm
While the US has shunned rate-setting regulation by withdrawing guidance from government agencies including the USPTO, NIST and DoJ and is diminishing proposed law-making, the Commission's interventionist approach prescribes a valuation methodology which a Chinese court has recently used to drastically and defectively undercut established rates.Whether the EP broadly accepts the Commission's proposed legislation as is, makes significant amendments, rejects some or all of it… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently provided crucial clarification on the patentability of inventions facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in particular working on ex parte reexamination proceedings, post-grant petitions (IPR, PGR, and CBM), or other administrative drafting and litigation experience. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in particular working on ex parte reexamination proceedings, post-grant petitions (IPR, PGR, and CBM), or other administrative drafting and litigation experience. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued guidance aimed at addressing these concerns. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued guidance aimed at addressing these concerns. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:40 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark TRI-FLEX TECHNOLOGY for "nail care preparations, nail strengtheners, non-medicated nail treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes, nail polish, nail color gels, nail lacquers, none of the foregoing containing collagen" [TECHNOLOGY disclaimed], finding confusion likely with the registered mark shown below, for "dietary supplements for humans containing Types I, II, and III Collagen. [read post]
