Search for: "Underwriters at Lloyds" Results 341 - 360 of 578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Clause 45.3 stipulates: “It shall be a condition precedent to the liability of the Underwriters that the Assured shall not at any stage prior to the commencement of legal proceedings knowingly or recklessly … mislead or attempt to mislead the Underwriters in the proper consideration of a claim or the settlement thereof by relying on any evidence which is false … conceal any circumstance or matter from the Underwriters material to the proper… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866 (29 July 2008) Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 883 (29 July 2008) Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors (”Bainbridge 1″) [2008] EWCA Civ 885 (29 July 2008) G, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:19 am
Where the covered risks are spread over multiple states, courts will generally locate the risk in one state, namely, "the state of the insured's domicile at the time the policy was issued," and a "corporate insured's domicile is the state of its principal place of business" (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v Foster Wheeler Corp., 36 AD3d 17, 24-25 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 928 [2007]). [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, to our list of cases in which the Court has called for the views of the Solicitor General. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Dillon Gage Inc of Dallas v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, Supreme Court of Texas No. 21-0312, and United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 20-10262 [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:26 am
”  Moreover, the policies did not obligate the excess insurers to pay until Aerojet was held liable by final judgment for an amount which exceeded the underlying insurance.Relying on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:58 am by Sandra Sithole
(Certain Underwriters of Lloyds v National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al) [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:37 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s v New Street Area Development, LLC : Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division: No A-1603-20 [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:53 am by admin
Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 327 S.W.3d 118 (Tex. 2010), the court rejected Ewing’s argument that the exclusion was limited to instances where the insured has assumed the liability of a third party. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:25 am by Michelle Claverol
P&C National Underwriter reported that the last eruption from this volcano lasted more than 12 months. [read post]