Search for: "United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 3:37 pm
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 453 F.3d 525 (D.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:02 am
In Warrior Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
’ – but who’s next in line for resale royalty entitlements? [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
The City prevailed on all issues but the general plan consistency issue pertaining to whether or not the City properly “coordinated” with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service as called for in the planning document. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
— Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, November 30, 2009 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc.… [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:04 am
Driscoll-Chippendale (202) 469-4921 JDriscoll-Chippendale@sheppardmullin.com [1] The following airlines were named as defendants in plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint: Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Alaska AirGroup, Inc., ATA Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., America West Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., Horizon Air… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
” [36] Courts look at whether the injuries to the spectator were foreseeable. [37] Along those same lines, those who sponsor sporting events owe their spectators and participants a limited duty of care. [38] Many states have adopted a limited-liability doctrine where defendants have a limited duty to maintain reasonable care in keeping their premises safe. [39] This is the reason why many sports facilities have screened or fenced off fields and arenas [40]. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:15 am
American Electric Power Company Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
" Any holdups in the case were the results of FireStar's inability to pay and reluctance to make key decisions, like authorizing the hiring of experts, the firm stated in court documents. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc. (11th Cir., July 23, 2009). [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
" As the on-line definitions all make clear, "information and belief" is a way to qualify an oath so that, if the statement is untrue, it's not perjury. [read post]