Search for: "United States v. Ahmed"
Results 341 - 360
of 399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
Bing AI was more eccentric: Guardian News and Media Ltd & Ors, Re HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors [2010] UKSC 1 Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC B18 (QB) Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) Mosley v The United Kingdom (Application no.48009/08) Ferdinand v Mgn Ltd (Rev 2) [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) It is perhaps difficult to imagine that more than one or two of these cases would make… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:04 am
Yesterday, we linked to the Times story reporting that President Hamid Karzai is now accusing the United States of complicity in a series of terror and insurgency attacks. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
The term is connected to a number of other similar terms that seek to give meaning to the same set of practices or states of social being: for example, the German-English Weltanschauung) or perhaps “lifeworlds. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:19 am
Noting evidence that his office had a history of excluding minorities from the position and that decisionmakers, who claimed to have based the decision on qualifications, performed no interviews and reviewed no personnel records, a First Circuit panel found triable questions on pretext and reversed summary judgment for the government (Ahmed v Johnson, May 21, 2014, Lipez, K). [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
United States The libel action by former Sheriff Joe Arpaio against CNN, Rolling Stone and the Huffington Post has been dismissed by a US District Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
She previewed oral arguments in Al Janko v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
,”—and calling for “destruction of the United States,” and “the destruction of the Jewish people. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
The United States has condemned Iran over the attacks in Kurdistan and Syria, calling them as “reckless and imprecise. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:24 am
KF 228 J57 W38 2012 Buying America from the Indians : Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:34 am
United StatesNational Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
United States President Biden has signed an Executive Order implementing an EU-US data privacy framework for transferring data. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
