Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 341 - 360 of 2,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2011, 7:08 am by Viking
North County Times is reporting the indefinite delay of United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm by Debra A. McCurdy
United States court case challenging the constitutionality of the ACA and its potential impact on individuals with pre-existing conditions. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Consequently, the court in Mosely held that the trial court erred in determining that the drug-related texts were properly authenticated.In Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Her claim that Walmart retaliated against her for pursuing her rights under the state’s workers’ compensation law also failed (Whitmire v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am by SHG
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:25 am by SHG
  The first, from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, is United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm
Another reason is -- if you live and commute along the United States-Mexico border -- it gives Border Patrol agents another reason to search your car. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
[is] not liable . . . if (1) the warnings or information that accompanied the product in its distribution were those approved by the United State Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm by Anthony Lake
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]