Search for: "United States v. Articles of Food and Drug"
Results 341 - 360
of 511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
United States, 335 U.S. 345 (1950) (“One article or thing is accompanied by another when it supplements or explains it . . . [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:46 pm
In this case, it comes from the Eleventh Circuit, with a special guest appearance from the Court of International Trade.The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The generic names, created to allow health workers to talk about the same drug without becoming confused by various manufacturers' proprietary names, are developed, in the United States at least, according to a scheme established by the United States Adopted Names Council [USAN], a scheme they describe as a "logical nomenclature classifications based on pharmacological and/or chemical relationships." [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Food and Drug Admin., Case No. 1:12-cv-01105-ABJ (D. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
There’s nothing like that for the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, but that didn’t stop him from holding that a non-existent federal statute displaced the laws of all fifty states. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:07 pm
Customs Service dogs are trained to disregard potential distractions such as food, harmless drugs, and residual scents. [read post]
