Search for: "United States v. Bailey"
Results 341 - 360
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 7:32 am
United States v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Bailey Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06 Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Bailey Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06 Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:38 am
Bailey (08-295) and Common Law Settlement Counsel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Bailey, 398 S.W.2d 946 (Tex. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
United States Steel Corp., 881 N.E.2d 1065 (Ind. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:52 pm
Payson v Payson, 274 Ga. 231 (2001) and Bailey v Bailey, 250 Ga. 15 (1982). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In the 1770s, the colonies of what would later be known as the United States of America sought their freedom from England. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:31 pm
United States Secret Service, 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1994), United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:09 am
The alleged fraud's case of characters included the following participants according to law enforcement: Joel V., 30, (Defendant 3). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Larry Craig v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
