Search for: "United States v. Bennett" Results 341 - 360 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated in 1999 that 73,000 cases of E. coli O157:H7 occur each year in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
 MCL 28.211a(b) defines `nonpublic information’ as `information to which access, use, or dissemination is restricted by a law or rule of this state or the United States. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” Also, of particular interest to administrative law types, Kagan and Ginsburg expressed differing opinions on the effect of Bennett v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts 2013) (citing United States v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 2:38 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
Bennett of the United States District Court in the Northern District of Iowa writes: “The time has come to recognize that summary judgment has become too expensive, too time-consuming for the parties and the judiciary, and too likely to unfairly deprive parties—usually plaintiffs—of their constitutional and statutory rights to trial by jury. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 2:38 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
Bennett of the United States District Court in the Northern District of Iowa writes: “The time has come to recognize that summary judgment has become too expensive, too time-consuming for the parties and the judiciary, and too likely to unfairly deprive parties—usually plaintiffs—of their constitutional and statutory rights to trial by jury. [read post]