Search for: "United States v. Best et al" Results 341 - 360 of 995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am by Andrew Spillane
 Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
We think Amy Davidson of The New Yorker's Close Read blog put it best, writing of the Christmas Day bombing attempt: It's a bit hard to follow the arguments Cheney et al. are making about how the near-miss over Detroit on Christmas Day shows that we really need to waterboard people and lock them up in places like Guantanamo. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To take the best-known precedent, after World War II the United States prosecuted German government lawyers in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
 This was the first such review of its kind in United States history. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In Precedent Partners I, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
In my view this is an anathema to the mandate of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution. [read post]