Search for: "United States v. Bird" Results 341 - 360 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Window or wall air-conditioning units shall be considered personal property. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
On September 22, 2009, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas approved the settlement. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Coral Beach
A recent study estimates that the economic costs of Salmonella illnesses in the United States associated with chicken is $2.8 billion annually,” the proposal states. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Harris, 13-1313, stems from a California Health & Safety Code law banning the sale of any product that “is the result of force feeding a bird for the purpose of enlarging the bird’s liver. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm by Nathan Sheard
United States, which held that “the Government must generally obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before acquiring” location records. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
 Cooper (2011 ONCA 150) the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the Ontario courts had jurisdiction to try a defamation claim brought by an Ontario based academic against the “Slavic Review”, an academic journal published in the United States, of which 81 copies were distributed in Ontario. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
In an opinion essay published on Monday in the Washington Post, President Biden, called for a constitutional amendment to overrule the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]