Search for: "United States v. Cardozo" Results 341 - 359 of 359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Cardozo School of Law, Nicholas A. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:38 am by Sean Hayes
Justice Cardozo in Palko v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
West, Losers: Recovering Lost Property in Japan and the United States, 37 Law & Soc. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:58 pm
Decades after the United States Supreme Court issued its 1954 desegregation mandate in Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:57 am
Cardozo School of Law The Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (CJICL) is one of the most influential and forward-looking law journals in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
, 23 Cardozo Arts & Ent LJ 739, discusses a DIFFERENT Classen case:In Classen Immunotherapies v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:00 am
Crane (Cardozo Law School) has posted The Story of United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
The history of the regulation of same-sex desire in the United States is one of overlapping and mutually reinforcing prohibitions. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]