Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 341 - 360
of 379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Click Here BLM, conservationists reach settlement over San Juan Basin resource plan. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:52 am
See generally City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
. - Amy Leigh Womack, Macon.com, February 16, 2010 Lawyers representing the city of Jeffersonville and the owners of a Twiggs County hunting plantation have drafted a consent order to try to settle a lawsuit alleging that the city violated the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
“It’s one of the most important threats to water quality right now,” said Miyoko Sakashita, a senior attorney at the group’s San Francisco office. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Instead, most states authorize the attorney general of the state to oversee and enforce charitable trusts. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Is that the case in San Francisco? [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 332, my April 5, 2019 post on which is found here), the Court rejected it as meritless. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Visit Large Law Firm
Law.com ®
10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
